Blockchain scaling has been a topic of interest since blockchains were first conceived. As more people use blockchains, the need for faster, more efficient systems has only grown. You’ve probably heard of the “blockchain trilemma” that Vitalik Buterin, Ethereum’s co-founder, brought up. It’s the idea that blockchains usually have to pick two out of three: scalability, decentralization, and security. Let’s dive into how some of the major blockchains have tackled this trade-off and how moving from monolithic to modular designs is opening up new scaling possibilities.
The Blockchain Trilemma
So, what’s the blockchain trilemma? It’s the idea that a blockchain can really only optimize for two out of three features:
- Scalability
- Decentralization
- Security
Different blockchains make different trade-offs here. Solana, for example, has gone for scalability and security, sacrificing some decentralization along the way. Meanwhile, Ethereum has mostly focused on decentralization and security, at the expense of scalability.
Ethereum’s Approach to Scaling
Ethereum faced a fundamental challenge: scaling. Its focus on decentralization and security has kept transaction speeds in check, which can lead to high fees and slow processing times, especially when things get busy — like during a popular NFT mint or a major token airdrop.
To address these challenges, Ethereum embraced a novel approach involving Layer 2 (L2) solutions, which are built on top of Ethereum’s main chain, also known as the Layer 1 (L1).
Monolithic Blockchains: One Chain, All Functions
Blockchains like Ethereum, Solana, and Bitcoin are called monolithic blockchains because they pack all functions into one single system. This means everything — transaction execution, consensus, data availability — is handled on the same chain.
While this structure keeps everything integrated, it also limits scalability. When all functions are bound together, making one function faster or more efficient often disrupts others, making it difficult to achieve optimal scaling.
The Rise of Layer 2 Solutions
Layer 2 solutions were introduced to help Ethereum scale without compromising its core principles. The concept behind L2s like Optimism and Arbitrum is straightforward: separate the execution layer onto a different blockchain while keeping other layers on Ethereum.
These L2 solutions allow Ethereum to offload some transactions to a separate chain, where they can be processed more quickly and cheaply. Afterward, the data is posted back to Ethereum, which maintains security and finality.
Because they only separate the execution layer, Optimism and Arbitrum are considered proto-modular blockchains. The idea is to decentralize transaction execution while preserving Ethereum’s security and decentralization.
Breaking Down Blockchain Layers
To understand modular blockchains, let’s take a closer look at the different layers that make up the whole system:
- Execution Layer
This layer is where smart contract transactions occur and modify the blockchain’s overall state. In Ethereum, this is handled by the Ethereum Virtual Machine (EVM), while in Solana, it’s the Solana Virtual Machine (SVM). - Consensus Layer
The consensus layer makes sure that all nodes on the network agree on the right sequence of blocks. This keeps the chain consistent and tamper-proof. - Settlement Layer
This layer stores the blockchain’s final state and, for L2s, allows for verification of activity in case of disputes, especially for optimistic rollups. - Data Availability Layer
This layer ensures that all transaction data is accessible and available. It allows nodes to reconstruct the blockchain’s state based on past transactions. If a previous blockchain state, x, and transaction, t, are known, data availability enables participants to validate the updated state, y. This accessibility supports decentralized verification, ensuring that any node can prove a new state from existing data.
The Modular Blockchain Path
The shift from monolithic to modular architectures is tackling some of the core challenges in the field. By separating key functions — execution, consensus, settlement, and data availability — modular blockchains provide a framework to balance scalability, security, and decentralization effectively.
As companies and protocols continue to develop Layer 2 solutions and modular architectures, they’re not just patching up today’s issues — they’re laying the groundwork for the next generation of blockchain technology.
Follow Sunrise
Please make sure to follow us at the links below for the latest updates about Sunrise!
Website: https://sunriselayer.io
Discord: https://discord.gg/sunrise
X/Twitter: https://x.com/SunriseLayer
Medium: https://sunriselayer.medium.com
Gitbook: https://docs.sunriselayer.io